Showing posts with label NARAL. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NARAL. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 29, 2014

Did Jersey's Pre-1973 Abortion Ban Really Kill Women? The Research Says Yes, Absolutely.

The debate over abortion is one of the central issues in American politics. Actually, abortion brings on a set of questions, one often feeding off another to shape opinions and passions. Is a person created at conception? If so, what rights does a fetus have? When, during the course of a pregnancy, is “personhood” reached or achieved? What is the proper role of the state in regulating abortions? If abortions were again banned, what would be the consequences for the women who would surely seek them?

Frequently, we hear a lot of rhetoric from the pro-choice side pointing to the dangers of banning abortion. If Roe v. Wade is reversed, many say, the reemergence of the illegal abortion industry (as well as dangerous self-inflicted attempted abortions) will occur. These shady practices of the past, according to pro-choice organizations like NARAL and NOW, resulted in illegal abortion ‘mills’ that operated outside the law and accepted medical practice. Modern day abortion advocates continually remind us that women seeking abortions died atrocious deaths at the hands of untrained, corrupt, and greedy quack doctors.

As a history educator with a lot of newfound, electronic access to newspaper and magazine archives, I find myself in the unique position to research the topic. I was interested to see if there is a solid historical record concerning such abortion mills and macabre deaths. Did they exist? Did women really die in any sort of numbers at their own hands or through the botched efforts of medical imposters and frauds?

After just a short search on abortion-related deaths involving New Jersey women before 1973 (the year Roe v. Wade established a nationally based, legal right to a first trimester abortion), I can honestly say, they did. Absolutely. And the deaths, or at least press coverage of them, go back far into our state’s history. How far? Try the 1840’s.

One of the earliest records of this comes from Morris County in the Denville/Rockaway area in November of 1846. According to the National Police Gazette, a popular magazine at the time, a “young” woman by the name of Elizabeth Peer had died as a result of an abortion. The unmarried Peer had gotten pregnant due to a scandalous affair. Fearful of the devastating social consequences, the young woman had approached several local doctors for help in attaining an abortion. One doctor testified that:

“In the month of July, the deceased first visited witness and requested him to produce an abortion. Witness refused. She came again about a month afterwards on the same errand. Witness fully stated to her the dangers…of such an operation. She told him…that she would rather die than suffer the [social]
The Abortion debate provokes 
historical questions
as well as moral ones.
disgrace.”

Eventually, according to court papers, Elizabeth Peer found an abortionist, a woman who ran a rather large and profitable New York City-based operation who went by the name of “Madame Costello.” Costello charged Peer $30 for the abortion – a huge sum at that time.

Peer had gotten the abortion only to succumb a month later to a nightmarish infection and/or hemorrhage. One doctor testified:

“He found her bowels uncommonly swollen - pulse small…vomiting with cold sweat and diarrhea…she then stated she had gone to New York to one of those famous female physician-houses, and that the membranes were ruptured by an instrument…”

There are other reports in later years. An August 1867 newspaper article informs us of the tragic death of one Elizabeth Ball, 28, from a “respectable family” in Newark. Ball had become pregnant as a result of an extramarital affair involving a man the newspaper called her “seducer”, Jacob Wilson. As in earlier stories, Ball was frantic to stop the pregnancy early on, and had traveled to Brooklyn to get an abortion. Before her death she told one doctor that the procedure had cost her $80 – a sum several times the average worker’s monthly wage. Ball had to endure ten agonizing days between the abortion and her passing.

One June 1868 account is particularly disturbing, as it recounts the grisly death of one exceptionally desperate 38 year old, Jersey City area woman and mother by the name of Henrietta Berry. Berry was so distressed to end her first trimester pregnancy that she underwent two self-inflicted attempts. The first was some kind of orally administered concoction, but this failed. The second proved painfully fatal:

“On Thursday she resorted to the use of some kind of instrument, by which it is supposed that the was injured internally, as she immediately grew worse, and although a physician was called in, death resulted in twenty four hours…deceased was 38…and the mother of four children.”

The deaths continued, some right up to the decade before Roe v. Wade. In May of 1963 the pages of The Washington Post revealed a grisly discovery. Angela Lach, a single 26 year old Sayreville educator, was found in a scene reminiscent of a horror movie:

“Miss Lach’s body, sprawled face up in the rain, was found last night in the driveway of a Lutherville (Maryland) estate when the owner returned home.”

Lach, in her first trimester of pregnancy, had apparently traveled from central New Jersey to a Baltimore motel to get an abortion and had not been seen by family since. Upon searching her purse, Police traced the man, a salesman, who had arranged the abortion to a local diner, where they arrested him:

“[Police] described him as a 42 year old traveling salesman who sells kitchen utensils in New York and New Jersey…the salesman said he drove Miss Lach to Baltimore from New Jersey Friday…but insisted that his last contact with her was a telephone conversation early Saturday…He was not charged.”

It was obvious that the abortion went wrong and Lach quickly died, only to be disposed of in a grisly, undignified way.

Over the course of my research I found numerous other New Jersey-based cases, but these three struck me as especially tragic. These women were from all different walks of life. In their desperation to preserve their dignity and control their own bodies they were forced to turn to the most despicable, greedy quacks that operated in places such women would have never otherwise visited, from back rooms in Brooklyn to cheap, seedy Maryland motels.


These women, their sufferings and ultimate demise are part of the historical record. Believe what you want about the central questions of abortion today, but their deaths were definitive results of a state where legal, safe abortions were impossible to get.  

Thursday, February 6, 2014

New Bills in the N.J. Legislature Take Aim at Reproductive Rights

As Trenton and the state media remain wrapped up and involved in the multi-faceted, twisted and interrelated scandals that have collectively been called “Bridgegate,” anti-abortion radicals in our Legislature continue their very real war against the right of women to control their bodies.

Their latest assault is in the form of two identical, dare I saw “twin” bills introduced in both houses. Together they are misleadingly titled the “Full Disclosure Ultrasound Act.” The Assembly’s bill is A848, the Senate’s S231.

Regardless of the name, the bills are aimed at placing another menacing roadblock on a woman’s road to attaining a legal, safe abortion – a road that for many women is one intensely personal and difficult enough without the interference of the state. The bill would require a doctor, as part of the “informed consent process,” to offer an ultrasound that presented the image of the fetus in utero.

The bill’s intent is obvious, that being to utilize the power of the state to generate some hoped-for ‘guilt trip’ on the part of any woman seeking a legal abortion. Apparently some of these women would, upon seeing the fetus, call off the procedure and proceed with the pregnancy. Is the pregnancy the result of a rape? Of an incestuous relationship? It really doesn’t matter. It’s just another moment of victimization for any woman seeking the exercise her constitutional right to control her own body.

These kinds of bills attest to the absolute ruthless deception of those who are not otherwise courageous enough to introduce a bill to outlaw abortion in all cases completely – a clearly unconstitutional idea anyway that would, according to most polls, be rejected by the overwhelming majority of the people of this state. These bills are a clear attempt to chip away at the hard-won, painstakingly defended rights to bodily control and privacy in Roe v. Wade.

These bills are part of a new dual-strategy wave of legislation, mostly occurring in southern state legislatures. The first part of the strategy is to add a myriad of new requirements and steps in the medical abortion process, to complicate and delay it and provoke mental agony on the part of the patient. The second part is to create a set of difficult or impossible requirements for clinics to meet, in an effort to limit them or close them down entirely. After all, what good is the right to have an abortion if there aren’t any clinics within 300 miles?

The bills that constitute the so-called “Full Disclosure Ultrasound Act,” should be rightfully renamed, in the spirit of full disclosure, “An Act to Continue the Efforts to End The Reproductive Rights of Women.”